Accelerated log building method

ABSTRACT

A method of building a log structure using naturally-shaped logs is provided. The method involves stacking layers of the log structure upon one another in a rough approximation of the final desired positioning, determining the distance of the greatest gap existing between the pairs of logs at each layer, determining groove cuts to be made for every log in the same layer using the same vertical groove dimension, determining a dimension of a final notch cut to be made in the logs of the lowest layer stacked according to this invention, and determining the final notch cuts to be made at layers above according to a relationship among the vertical groove dimensions that were marked for each of the grooves in a single layer and the dimension of the final notch cut determined for the lowest layer of logs stacked according to the present invention.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] The present application is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication filed Mar. 14, 2002 and assigned Ser. No. 10/099,601, whichis a continuation of U.S. patent application filed Mar. 2, 2000 andassigned Ser. No. 09/517,368, the entire disclosure each of which isincorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The present invention relates to the construction of a log wallor structure. More particularly, this invention relates to a method forconstructing a log wall or structure using naturally-shaped logs.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] Log structures have been built for centuries. Historically, logstructures were handcrafted using logs in their natural shape. That is,using logs that retain the unique, natural shapes of the trees fromwhich they came. More recently, log buildings have been constructedusing prefabricated logs. For example, such logs are commonlymanufactured to have a common shape, whereby they can be usedinterchangeably. While prefabricated log structures can be built morequickly and affordably than those built by hand, many people prefer theaesthetics of a handcrafted log home. Accordingly, handcrafted homesremain popular even though their construction commonly involvessignificant time and expense.

[0004] The general procedure used in log construction developed longbefore the advent of cranes and other mechanized lifting equipment.Because logs are heavy, awkward, and dangerous to lift, early logbuilders did not want to lift logs onto a wall more than once. Thus,once each log was positioned upon a wall, it was processed completelyuntil it fit in its permanent position on the wall. Only then would thenext log be processed. Thus, at any given time, only the logs that wereon the exposed top layer would be processed. Even though this generalprocedure was invented for log construction without modern liftingequipment, this procedure is used even today by those who buildhandcrafted log homes. This traditional procedure will now be describedas it would typically be applied in building a simple four-walledstructure.

[0005] Each log is processed one-at-a-time through a series of steps toproduce a handcrafted log structure. First, a set of logs are selectedand the bark is removed from each log. The first-layer logs are thenselected and positioned. Traditionally, each of the first-layer andsecond-layer logs (or “sill logs”) is cut to have a planar bottomsurface that will rest on the floor deck to provide the structure with asolid foundation. Two first-layer logs are positioned in a parallel,spaced-apart configuration. Each additional layer comprises two logsthat are stacked crosswise over the logs of the layer below. Forexample, the second-layer in such a structure comprises two logspositioned in a crosswise stack on top of the first-layer logs. A notchis marked near both ends of each second-layer log, then the notches arecut, whereafter the second-layer logs are restacked over the first-layerlogs with each notch fitted over the end of a first-layer log. Thenotches in the second-layer logs are commonly dimensioned such that theplanar bottom surfaces of the second-layer logs will be flush with theplanar bottom surfaces of the first-layer logs when these notches arefitted over the first-layer logs.

[0006] Once the first-layer and second-layer logs are in place andfitted, the third-layer logs are selected and lifted into place. Eachthird-layer log is positioned in a crosswise stack atop the second-layerof logs such that each third-layer log lies directly above a first-layerlog. At this stage, there is a gap between each pair of adjacentfirst-layer and third-layer logs. This gap will often be wider at oneend than at the other. Both ends of this gap are measured to determinehow the adjacent third-layer log can be lowered to make the gaps moreuniform from end to end. A rough notch is then cut into the end of thethird-layer log that is adjacent the wide end of the gap. The depth ofthis rough notch is such that when it is fitted over the second-layerlog below, the third-layer log is lowered to a position where thevertical height of the gap is about the same at both ends. Commonly, arough notch is cut into both ends of each third-layer log so each gap ismade to be both less tall and more uniform.

[0007] Even after rough notching, there will be one point where the gapbetween each pair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs isgreatest. This is because each log has a unique and irregular shape thatcorresponds to the natural shape of the tree from which it came. Themaximum height of this gap is measured for each pair of adjacentfirst-layer and third-layer layer logs.

[0008] A marking instrument similar to an inside caliper is then used tomark (or “scribe”) a long groove that will be cut in the bottom surfaceof each third-layer log. The marking points of the caliper (or“scriber”) are set to a distance (the “scribe setting”) that is slightlygreater than the maximum gap height that was found for that particularpair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs. Because the maximumgap between each pair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs willbe different, the scribe setting for each such pair will likewise bedifferent.

[0009] The scriber is used to mark a final notch cut on both ends ofeach third-layer log. The scriber is used to mark a final notch cut thatwill lower each end of each third-layer log by the same distance thatwas used to mark the long groove cut for that pair of logs.

[0010] The long groove and the final notches are then cut for eachthird-layer log. This is commonly done by rolling each third-layer logupside down and cutting the long groove and the final notches that havebeen scribed. Alternatively, each third-layer log may be removed fromthe wall and placed near the ground for cutting. Each third-layer log isthen put in its finally fitted position. Only after the third-layer logshave been completely processed and fitted into their final position,does the builder begin working on the fourth-layer logs. The same stepsare performed for each fourth-layer log until each log in thefourth-layer is fitted into its final position. This process is repeatedfor each of the remaining logs in the walls of the structure. Thus, eachlog on the exposed upper layer is fully processed and placed into itsfinal, permanent position before any work is done on logs of higherlayers.

[0011] As can be seen, the traditional method of fully processing eachlog one log at a time is inefficient and slow. For example, afour-walled building with nine logs in each wall will comprise 36 logs.However, using the traditional method, only two out of 36 logs areprocessed at one time. Thus, even a small, simple log structure takes along time to build with the traditional method. Clients can befrustrated by the slow pace at which handcrafted structures are built.Accordingly, the development of the log building industry has beenaffected by the high costs and lengthy wait-times that arecharacteristic of the traditional log-by-log building method.

[0012] In short, traditional methods are adequately suited to buildingon the final foundation and without a crane. However, they are poorlysuited to building off-site and with a crane. Traditional methods weregreat in the year 1620, but they are just poor business choices for theyear 2001.

[0013] Modern mass-production methods typically benefit from using workforces comprised of specialized laborers rather than small work crews ofhighly-skilled craftsmen. It is difficult to use a large number ofworkers in traditional log building methodology. Since only a few logsare processed at one time, there is only enough work for a few workersto do. Thus, log building companies typically keep each work crew small.Furthermore, when crews are small, it is useful if each worker isskilled at performing many log construction tasks. This makesspecialization of labor difficult. It is also time-consuming and costlyto hire and keep workers who are proficient at the full spectrum oftasks. Likewise, it is expensive to adequately train workers in all ofthe numerous skills required in log building. Furthermore, those workerswho become skilled at all aspects of log construction are sometimestempted to leave employment to start their own log constructionbusiness. In summary, log building companies can find employment,training, and maintenance of skilled workers and crews to be acontinuing expense.

[0014] The traditional method of log building can also be unsafe. It canbe difficult and expensive to erect scaffolding around a log structureduring construction. Thus, where long grooves are cut into logs that areresting atop walls, workers may be required to walk backwards on top ofthe log walls while operating a chainsaw. This can obviously be unsafe.For example, this may be the case where double-cut long grooves areused. This type of groove is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,951,435, whichis issued to Beckedorf (the incorporations of which are hereinincorporated by reference).

[0015] It is common to assemble each log shell twice using traditionallog building methods. Commonly, the shell is built once at theconstruction yard and again at its final location. Since each log isfully processed one at a time with the traditional method, this addssignificantly to the construction time. This also means that each log ishandled many times. Inevitably, there are costs and risks each time thatheavy, awkward logs are handled at a construction site. There is a riskof accident each time a log is moved or lifted. Furthermore, the peeled,natural surface of each log can be scratched and dented by liftingtongs. Such damage is undesirable since the peeled surface of the logcommonly serves as the finished surface of the walls.

[0016] Surprisingly, log home builders today use the same basicprocedures that builders were using hundreds of years ago. Processingone log at a time is time-consuming and costly. It would be desirable toprovide a method of building handcrafted structures withnaturally-shaped logs that would allow builders to process more than onelog at one time. It would be particularly desirable to provide a methodthat would allow builders to process all of the logs in the walls of alog structure at the same time.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0017] One embodiment of the invention provides a method of building astructure having a plurality of log walls. The method comprisesproviding a plurality of logs wherein each log has a first end regionand a second end region. A first layer of logs is positioned in aspaced-apart configuration. A second layer of logs is positioned abovethe first layer of logs in a crosswise stack wherein each end region ofeach second-layer log rests above a first-layer log. A third layer oflogs is positioned above the second layer of logs in a crosswise stackwherein each end region of each third-layer log rests above asecond-layer log, and wherein each third-layer log lies above andextends alongside an adjacent first-layer log to define a pair ofadjacent first-layer and third-layer logs, whereby a first gap is formedbetween each such pair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs. Afourth layer of logs is positioned above the third layer of logs in acrosswise stack wherein each end region of each fourth-layer log restsabove a third-layer log, and wherein each fourth-layer log lies aboveand extends alongside an adjacent second-layer log to define a pair ofadjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logs, whereby a second gap isformed between each such pair of adjacent second-layer and fourth-layerlogs. A maximum height of the first gaps in the structure is determined.Long groove lines representing long groove cuts are scribed on all ofthe third-layer logs using a single long groove scribe setting. Thesingle long groove scribe setting that is used for all of thethird-layer logs is a first vertical distance that is at least as greatas the determined maximum height of the first gaps in the structure. Amaximum height of the second gaps in the structure is determined. Longgroove lines representing long groove cuts are scribed on all of thefourth-layer logs using a single long groove scribe setting. The singlelong groove scribe setting that is used for all of the fourth-layer logsis a second vertical distance that is at least as great as thedetermined maximum height of the second gaps in the structure. Finalnotch lines are scribed on all of the second-layer logs using a singlefinal notch scribe setting. The single final notch scribe setting thatis used for all of the second-layer logs represents a final notch cutthat will lower both end regions of each second-layer log by a firstdrop distance and into a final position when each second-layer finalnotch is fitted over the first-layer log on which it rests. Final notchlines are scribed on all of the third-layer logs using a single finalnotch scribe setting. The single final notch scribe setting that is usedfor all of the third-layer logs represents a final notch cut that willlower both end regions of each third-layer log by a second drop distancethat is approximately equal to the first vertical distance less thefirst drop distance when each third-layer final notch is fitted over thesecond-layer log on which it rests.

[0018] In another embodiment of the invention, there is provided amethod of building a structure having a plurality of log walls. Themethod comprises providing a plurality of logs wherein each log has afirst end region and a second end region. A first layer of logs ispositioned in a spaced-apart configuration. A second layer of logs ispositioned above the first layer of logs in a crosswise stack whereineach end region of each second-layer log rests above a first-layer log.A third layer of logs is positioned above the second layer of logs in acrosswise stack wherein each end region of each third-layer log restsabove a second-layer log, and wherein each third-layer log lies aboveand extends alongside an adjacent first-layer log to define a pair ofadjacent first-layer and third-layer logs, whereby a first gap is formedbetween each such pair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs. Amaximum height of the first gaps in the structure is determined. Longgroove lines representing long groove cuts are scribed on all of thethird-layer logs using a single long groove scribe setting, G1. Thesingle long groove scribe setting, G1, that is used for all of thethird-layer logs is at least as great as the determined maximum heightof the first gaps in the structure. Final notch lines are scribed on allof the second-layer logs using a single final notch scribe setting, N1.The single final notch scribe setting, N1, that is used for all of thesecond-layer logs represents a final notch cut that will lower both endregions of each second-layer log into a final position when eachsecond-layer final notch is fitted over the first-layer log on which itrests. Final notch lines representing final notch cuts are scribed onall of the third-layer logs using a single final notch scribe setting,N2, where N2=G1−N1.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0019]FIG. 1 is a perspective view illustrating a crosswise stack oflogs formed according to one aspect of the present invention;

[0020]FIG. 2A is a top view illustrating a particular configurationaccording to which a four-walled structure could be built in accordancewith the present invention;

[0021]FIG. 2B is top view illustrating an alternate configurationaccording to which a four-walled structure could be built in accordancewith the present invention;

[0022]FIG. 2C is top view illustrating an alternate configurationaccording to which a four-walled structure could be built in accordancewith the present invention;

[0023]FIG. 2D is a top view illustrating an alternate configurationaccording to which a structure could be built in accordance with thepresent invention;

[0024]FIG. 3 is a top view illustrating a particular configurationaccording to which a structure could be built in accordance with thepresent invention;

[0025]FIG. 4 is a perspective view schematically illustratingfirst-layer logs and second-layer logs that have been fitted in a finalposition according to one aspect of the present invention;

[0026]FIG. 5A is side view schematically illustrating four layers oflogs that have been stacked according to one aspect of the presentinvention;

[0027]FIG. 5B is a broken away isolation view of the intersection of twologs stacked in accordance with another embodiment of the presentinvention;

[0028]FIG. 6A is a side view schematically illustrating four layers oflogs that have been stacked in accordance with one embodiment of thepresent invention;

[0029]FIG. 6B is a side view of three layers of logs that have beenstacked in accordance with an alternate embodiment of the presentinvention;

[0030]FIG. 7 is a side view illustrating the determination of a longgroove cut according to one aspect of the present invention;

[0031]FIG. 8 is a perspective view illustrating the determination of afinal notch cut according to one aspect of the present invention;

[0032]FIG. 9 is a side view illustrating the determination of a finalnotch according to one aspect of the present invention;

[0033]FIG. 10A is a side view of a second-layer log with final notchescut according to one aspect of the present invention;

[0034]FIG. 10B is a side view of a second-layer log with final notchescut according to another aspect of the present invention;

[0035]FIG. 10C is a side view of a second-layer log with final notchescut according to an alternate aspect of the present invention; and

[0036]FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a log with a long groove and onefinal notch cut according to one aspect of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0037] Log structures of the present invention are built using aplurality of logs wherein each log has a first end region and a secondend region. The first and second end regions are respectively adjacentto the first and second ends of each log. A span extends longitudinallybetween the first and second ends of each log.

[0038] The invention can be used quite advantageously to build logstructures using naturally shaped logs. It is to be understood that alog will be referred to herein as “naturally shaped” if it hassubstantially the same shape as the tree from which it came. Mostnaturally shaped logs are tapered, and have a small end (or a “tip”) anda large end (or a “butt”). Accordingly, discussion herein typifies useof the present invention to build structures using logs that have asmall end and a large end. However, it would be obvious to those skilledin the art of building or designing log structures that the presentinvention could also be used to build structures with naturally shapedlogs that have little or no taper.

[0039] The bark is commonly removed from each log before constructionbegins. This may be accomplished by hand or by machine. If desired, thelogs may also be sanded or otherwise prepared.

[0040] Structures can be built according to the present invention usinglogs with any diameter. Logs having a diameter of at least 10 inches attheir small end give excellent results for many structures. However,smaller logs would also give acceptable results. Particularly desirablyresults have been achieved using logs with an average diameter of 14inches or more. The selection of logs may also be based on the personalpreference of the builder or client. For example, some people may preferlogs that have unusually small diameters, while others may prefer logswith unusually large diameters. In any event, selecting a set of logsthat will be suitable for a particular structure is well within thecapability of those skilled in the art of designing or building logstructures.

[0041] A first layer of logs is positioned in a spaced-apartconfiguration. It is to be understood that the term “first layer” willbe used herein to refer to the first layer of logs that is added to astructure in accordance with the present invention. As would be obviousto those skilled in the art of log building, one could begin to practicethe present invention at any layer in a structure. For example, thebottommost three layers in a structure could be constructed using thetraditional method of log-by-log building, whereafter additional layerscould be added according to the present invention. Likewise, the bottomstory of a structure could be built using traditional methods, while anupper story could be built according to the present invention. A greatmany variations of this nature would be obvious to those of skill in theinstant art, and would fall within the scope of this invention.

[0042] In most cases, it will be optimal to build an entire structureaccording to the present invention. Accordingly, discussion herein willtypify construction of a log structure wherein all of the layers,beginning with the bottommost layer, are added in accordance with thepresent invention.

[0043] Each wall of a log structure typically has a base formed by thebottom surface of first and second-layer logs. To provide a stable basefor each wall, it is common to machine first and second-layer logs suchthat a bottom length of each log is planar. Such logs are commonlyreferred to as sill logs. For example, builders commonly saw along thelength of each sill log to form a flat longitudinal bottom surface. Ifdesired, the bottom surface of each log can be further machined (such asby planing or sanding) to make it is as flat as possible. FIG. 4 showstwo first-layer logs 10 that have a planar bottom surface 15 and twosecond-layer logs 20 that have a planar bottom surface 25. Sill logs aremachined to dimensions that complement the design of each structure.Those of skill in the art would be able to process sill logsappropriately by referring to the layout of the structure being built.In most cases, it is desirable to provide each first and second-layerlog with a planar bottom surface. Accordingly, discussion hereintypifies use of the present invention to build a structure wherein thebottom of the first-layer and second-layer sill logs have been cut flat.However, this is certainly not a requirement in practicing the presentinvention.

[0044] Traditionally, the planar bottom surface of each first-layer andsecond-layer sill logs is cut at the beginning of the building process.That is, before any work is done on the third-layer of logs. In buildingstructures according to the present invention, it can be advantageous tocut the planar bottoms of the sill logs later in the building process.For example, it can be advantageous to determine such cuts after thebuilder has determined whatever groove and final notch cuts will be madein the logs. This will be more thoroughly discussed below.

[0045] The first-layer of logs can be positioned using any suitablefoundation or supports. For example, the first-layer logs may simply beplaced on the ground. Alternatively, they may be placed on blocks,jacks, or other elevated surfaces that will provide stable positioning.When a log structure is initially constructed at a building yard remotefrom the permanent site of the structure, it is common to place thefirst-layer logs on temporary supports that securely hold thefirst-layer logs in a generally horizontal position. This may beparticularly desirable where the available ground is uneven, or wouldnot otherwise provide a suitable foundation.

[0046] In another aspect of the present invention, the first-layer logsare held in position by devices that support the ends of eachfirst-layer log. For example, such positioning devices may comprise ashort axle or a dowel pin that is bolted to each end of each log.Alternatively, these devices may include a gripping means such as one ormore spikes, pins, or the like that may be pressed against or into theend surfaces of a log. For example, such spikes may be pressed into theouter ends of a log in much the same way that the pins of a corn cobholder are pressed into the outer ends of a cob of corn. The axles (orwhatever gripping means are used) may be movable vertically andhorizontally to allow the position of each first-layer log to beadjusted. Furthermore, such gripping means may be movable rotationallyabout the longitudinal axis of each log such that once a first-layer logis in a certain position, it can be rotated to orient each log accordingto its unique contour. For example, builders commonly orient logs thatare curved or bowed (or have “sweep”) in certain ways.

[0047] The first-layer logs are positioned in a spaced-apartconfiguration that reflects the particular design of the structure beingbuilt. An infinite variety of differently laid out structures can bebuilt according to the present invention. Consequently, the first-layerlogs may be positioned in a great number of different spaced-apartconfigurations. In many cases, the first-layer logs will be arranged ina spaced-apart configuration wherein at least one pair of spaced-apartlogs are generally parallel. For example, FIG. 1 shows a stack of logsthat reflects a simple four-walled log structure. The illustratedstructure comprises two generally parallel first-layer logs 10. However,a structure need not have any first-layer logs that are parallel to oneanother. For example, FIGS. 2A and 2B typify two particular four-walledconfigurations that have two first-layer logs 10 that are not parallel.Of course, depending on the layout of a particular structure, more thantwo first-layer logs may be provided. For example, FIG. 3 typifies aparticular eight-walled configuration that has four first-layer logs 10.Those skilled in the art would be able to readily determine thepositioning of each first-layer log according to the desired layout fora particular structure.

[0048] In one aspect of the present invention, the first-layer logs arearranged in a configuration wherein at least one pair of first-layerlogs are spaced apart in a generally-opposed configuration with theirsmall and large ends inversely oriented. This would commonly bedesirable where a pair of generally-opposed first-layer logs will formwalls on opposite sides of a structure being built. For example, FIGS.2A-2D illustrate configurations wherein two generally-opposedfirst-layer logs 10 that will form walls on opposite sides of astructure have their small S and large L ends inversely oriented.Likewise, FIG. 3 shows a configuration having four first-layer logs 10,wherein two pairs of generally-opposed first-layer logs will form wallsthat are on opposite sides of a structure. The logs of eachgenerally-opposed pair have their small S and large L ends inverselyoriented. This reflects a positioning pattern wherein parallel logs inthe same layer have their small and large ends inversely oriented. Thatis, with the taper of each such log facing generally oppositedirections. However, this is certainly not a requirement. For example,many builders position parallel logs in the same layer such that theirsmall and large ends face the same direction. Variations of this naturewould be obvious to those skilled in the art of designing and buildinglog structures. Moreover, it is to be understood that the presentinvention can be practiced without orienting the small and large ends ofthe logs in any particular manner. However, as would be obvious toskilled artisans, such orientations can be used advantageously toconstruct walls that are approximately level.

[0049] A second layer of logs is positioned in a crosswise stack abovethe first layer of logs. The second layer is positioned such that eachend region of each second-layer log rests above a first-layer log.Commonly, the second layer of logs is positioned such that each endregion of each second-layer log actually rests on a first-layer log. Forexample, the four-walled structure illustrated in FIG. 1 shows twosecond-layer logs 20 positioned atop two first-layer logs 10 in acrosswise stack wherein each end region of each second-layer log 20 sitson one end region of a first-layer log 10. However, each end region ofeach second-layer log need not be contiguous with (that is, touching)the first-layer log below. For example, it may be desirable to raise oneor both ends of certain second-layer logs. In this case, any suitableshim, lift, spacer, or the like may be placed between any such endregion of a second-layer log and the first-layer log below. Moreover,the second-layer logs need not be directly supported by first-layerlogs.

[0050] In one aspect of the present invention, one or more second-layerlogs are held by positioning devices that support the ends of each log.For example, the second-layer logs may be held in position by devices(such as those discussed with reference to the first-layer logs) thatare secured to both ends of each second-layer log. Logs held by suchdevices may be movable vertically and horizontally to allow the positionof each second-layer log to be adjusted. Likewise, the logs held by suchdevices may be movable rotationally about the longitudinal axis of eachlog such that once a second-layer log is in a certain position, it canbe rotated to orient each log as desired. The unique contour ofnaturally-shaped logs commonly makes it desirable to orient bowed logsin certain ways.

[0051] In some cases, it will be preferable if the very ends of eachsecond-layer log are not positioned directly above a first-layer log.For example, the structure shown in FIG. 1 is stacked such that the endregions of each pair of contiguous (that is, touching) first-layer andsecond-layer logs overlap at a crossing point that is a certain distancefrom the very end of the second-layer log. In many cases, this isdesirable since it will provide ample space for notches to be cut in thebottoms of each second-layer log. Furthermore, it is preferable that theend regions of the second-layer logs not be positioned above or on thevery end of a first-layer log. In some cases, such positioning will notprovide sufficiently stable seating for the second-layer logs. Moreover,in many cases the client or builder may desire the distinctiveappearance that is achieved by structures that have such log extensions(or “flyways”). However, as would be obvious to those of skill in theart of log building, log extensions would not be required where certaintypes of notches are used. For example, a notch style that is commonlyreferred to as a “dovetail” notch has interlocking angled surfaces andcan be used without log extensions.

[0052] Builders can use the present invention to construct an infinitevariety of differently laid-out structures. Consequently, the secondlayer of logs can be arranged in a great many ways. With reference tothe design of a particular structure, the general positioning of eachsecond-layer log would be obvious to those skilled in the art ofbuilding or designing log structures.

[0053] In many cases, it will be desirable to arrange the second layerof logs such that at least one pair of second-layer logs 20 arespaced-apart in a generally parallel configuration. For example, theconfiguration shown in FIG. 1 comprises two spaced-apart second-layerlogs that are generally parallel to one another. Similarly, theconfiguration typified in FIG. 3 has two pairs of spaced-apart,generally parallel second-layer logs 20. However, it is not necessarythat any of the second-layer logs be parallel to one another. Forexample, FIGS. 2C and 2D typify two particular four-walledconfigurations wherein the second-layer logs 20 are not parallel to oneanother.

[0054] In one aspect of the present invention, the second-layer logs arearranged in a configuration wherein at least one pair of second-layerlogs are spaced apart in a generally-opposed configuration with theirsmall and large ends inversely oriented. Commonly, this would bedesirable where a pair of spaced-apart second-layer logs will form wallson opposite sides of a structure. For example, FIGS. 2A-2D illustrateconfigurations wherein a pair of generally-opposed second-layer logswill form walls on opposite sides of a structure. Likewise, FIG. 3 showsa configuration having four second-layer logs 20, wherein two pairs ofgenerally-opposed second-layer logs will form walls on opposite sides ofa structure. The illustrated logs 20 of each generally-opposed pair havethe small S and large L ends inversely oriented.

[0055] This orientation of second-layer logs reflects a commonpositioning pattern wherein the parallel logs in the same layer havetheir small and large ends facing opposite directions. As was discussedabove with reference to the orientation of the first-layer logs, manybuilders position the parallel logs in the same layer such that theirsmall and large ends face the same direction. Variations of this naturewould be obvious to those skilled in the art of log building.Furthermore, skilled artisans in the instant field would recognize thatthe present invention can be practiced without orienting the small andlarge ends of the logs in any particular manner. However, as would beobvious to those skilled in the art of log building, such orientationscan be used advantageously to construct walls that are as level aspossible.

[0056] In one aspect of the present invention, a rough notch is cut intoat least one end region of each second-layer log such that the flatbottom surface of each second-layer log is generally horizontal wheneach second-layer rough notch is fitted over the first-layer log onwhich it rests. In cases where the second-layer logs have beenpositioned directly atop the first-layer of logs, one end region of eachsecond-layer log will sometimes be higher than the other. For example,where one end region of a second-layer log rests on the small end regionof a first-layer log while the other end region of that log rests on thelarge end region of a first-layer log, the former end region of thesecond-layer log will sometimes be higher than the latter end region.This is perhaps best seen with reference to FIG. 5A, wherein the largeend region L of the illustrated second-layer log 20 rests atop the largeend region L of a first-layer log 10. In this case, it would bedesirable to cut a rough notch into the large end region L of theillustrated second-layer log 20 such that the flat bottom surface 25 ofthis log 20 will be generally horizontal when such notch is fitted overthe first-layer log 10 on which it rests. This is best seen in FIG. 5B,wherein a rough notch 81 cut into the large end L of the illustratedsecond-layer log 20 is dimensioned such that, when it is fitted over thelarge end L of the illustrated first-layer log 10, the large end L ofthe second-layer log 20 is lowered a certain distance 83 and into aposition wherein the flat bottom surface 25 of the illustratedsecond-layer log 20 is generally horizontal.

[0057] Where rough notches are used, it may be particularly desirable tocut a rough notch into at least one end of each second-layer log suchthat the bottom surfaces of all of the second-layer logs in thestructure will lie generally in a common horizontal plane when eachsecond-layer rough notch is fitted over the first-layer log on which itrests. As would be obvious to log builders having ordinary skill, thiswill allow the builder to bring all of the second-layer logs to theirfinal positions by lowering both ends of each second-layer log the samedistance, as is discussed below.

[0058] It would be obvious to those skilled in the art of log buildingthat rough notches can be used at various stages during the buildingprocess to accomplish a variety of goals. These reasons include: makingthe gap between adjacent pairs of logs more uniform; separatingvertically adjacent pairs of logs by a gap of a certain verticaldimension; stabilizing the logs; helping to influence the shoulderheights of the logs; and making certain logs or portions of logshorizontal or level. Since the many of the possibilities are well knownto those skilled in the relevant art, they will not be discussed infurther detail. Furthermore, it would be obvious to those skilled in theart of designing or building log structures that the present inventioncan be practiced without using any rough notches. However, as skilledartisans in the instant field would appreciate, rough notches can beused quite advantageously in many ways when building structuresaccording to the present invention.

[0059] A third-layer of logs is positioned in a crosswise stack abovethe second-layer of logs. The third-layer is positioned such that eachend region of each third-layer log rests above a second-layer log.Commonly, the third-layer of logs is positioned such that each endregion of each third-layer log actually rests on a second-layer log. Forexample, the third-layer logs 30 illustrated in FIG. 1 are positionedsuch that each end region of each third-layer log 30 rests on one endregion of a second-layer log 20. However, each end region of eachthird-layer log need not be contiguous with the second-layer log below.For example, it may be desirable to raise one or both ends of certainthird-layer logs. In such cases, a shim or the like may be placedbetween any such end region and the log below. Furthermore, it is notnecessary that the third-layer logs be directly supported bysecond-layer logs. For example, in one aspect of the present invention,one or more third-layer logs are held by positioning devices (such asthose discussed above) that can be secured to the ends of a log. Suchdevices may allow the user to adjust the position of each logvertically, horizontally, and rotationally.

[0060] Each third-layer log lies above and extends alongside an adjacentfirst-layer log to define a pair of adjacent first-layer and third-layerlogs. For example, the bottom two logs in the south wall S of thestructure illustrated in FIG. 1 form an adjacent pair of first-layer andthird-layer logs. In most cases, it will be preferable if eachthird-layer log lies directly above the adjacent first-layer log, suchas where vertical walls are to be formed. In such cases, the third-layerlogs are optimally positioned such that the longitudinal axes of eachpair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs lie generally in acommon plane that is vertical. In other words, the third-layer logs arepositioned such that each third-layer log lies generally plumb above anadjacent first-layer log. For example, each third-layer log 30illustrated in FIG. 1 lies generally plumb above an adjacent first-layerlog 10. If desired, though, a structure with sloped walls could be builtaccording to the present invention. In such a structure, the third-layerlogs would be positioned such that the longitudinal axes of adjacentfirst-layer and third-layer logs lie generally in a common plane that issloped to the vertical. Variations of this nature would be obvious tothose skilled in the art of building or designing log structures.

[0061] A first gap is formed between each pair of adjacent first-layerand third-layer logs. The upper and lower boundaries of each first gapare formed respectively by the bottom surface of a third-layer log andthe top surface of an adjacent first-layer log. This is perhaps bestseen with reference to FIG. 6A, wherein the illustrated first gap 31 hasan upper boundary defined by the bottom surface 35 of the adjacentthird-layer log 30 and a lower boundary defined by the top surface 17 ofthe adjacent first-layer log 10. The number of first gaps in a structurewill depend on the layout of the structure. For example, the four-walledstructure shown in FIG. 1 has two first gaps 31, whereas an eight-walledstructure built according to the configuration typified in FIG. 3 wouldhave four first gaps (not shown).

[0062] Where the third-layer logs are positioned directly atop thesecond-layer logs, the height of each first gap will typically varyalong the length of the adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs. Forexample, the height of each first gap will commonly be greater near theend region of each third-layer log that sits atop the large end regionof a second-layer log. This is best seen with reference to FIG. 6A,wherein the height of the illustrated first gap 31 is greatest near thesmall end region S of the adjacent third-layer log 30.

[0063] It is preferable to adjust the relative positions of each pair ofadjacent first-layer and third-layer logs such that each first gap has aheight that is substantially the same at the small and large end regionsof the adjacent third-layer log. That is, the relative positions ofadjacent logs are adjusted such that the height of each first gap ismore uniform from end to end. As is discussed below, by making theheight of each first gap more uniform from end to end, one can minimizethe wall height that is lost when grooves are cut into the bottomsurfaces of each third-layer log. This can be accomplished in differentways.

[0064] In one aspect of the present invention, a rough notch is cut intoat least one end region of each third-layer log. These notches may becut such that each first gap has a substantially similar height at thesmall and large end regions of the adjacent third-layer log when eachthird-layer rough notch is fitted over the second-layer log on which itrests. For example, the height of the first gap 31 shown in FIG. 6A isgreater near the small end region S of the illustrated third-layer log30 than it is near the large end region L of that log. In this case, itwould be desirable to cut a rough notch into the small end region S ofthe illustrated third-layer log 30 such that the first gap 31 will havea substantially similar height at the small S and large L end regions ofthis third-layer log when the rough notch is fitted over the illustratedlarge end region L of a second-layer log.

[0065] In another aspect of the invention, positioning devices could beused to make the height of each first gap more uniform from end to end.As discussed above, such devices may allow the user to adjust theposition of each log vertically, horizontally, and rotationally. Thus,it would be possible to adjust the relative positioning of adjacentfirst-layer and third-layer logs such that the height of each first gapis substantially the same at the large and small end regions of theadjacent third-layer log.

[0066] In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the relativepositioning of each pair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs isadjusted such that all of the first gaps in the structure have a maximumheight that is substantially the same. This may be done by cuttingappropriately dimensioned rough notches into the third-layer logs.Alternatively, positioning devices such as those discussed above may beused to adjust the relative positions of each adjacent pair offirst-layer and third-layer logs such that all of the first gaps have amaximum height that is substantially the same. As is discussed below,this will minimize the amount of wall height that will ultimately belost when a groove is cut into the bottom surface of each third-layerlog.

[0067] It is well known by those skilled in the relevant art that it canbe advantageous to orient logs in the same wall such that verticallyadjacent logs have their small and large ends inversely oriented. Forexample, each pair of adjacent first-layer 10 and third-layer 30 logsillustrated in FIG. 1 have their small S and large L ends inverselyoriented. Likewise, each pair of adjacent third-layer 30 and fifth-layer50 logs have their small S and large L ends inversely oriented. The sameis true of each adjacent pair of fifth-layer 50 and seventh-layer 70logs. It can be advantageous to repeat such a pattern all the way upeach wall in a structure since it tends to produce walls that are level.It would be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art of logbuilding that other variations of this pattern would also be acceptable.For example, the bottom two logs in a wall could both have their smallends facing the same direction, while the small ends of the third andfourth logs in that wall could be facing an opposite direction, and soon. Furthermore, it would be obvious to those of ordinary skill in theinstant art that the present invention can be practiced without adheringto any such pattern.

[0068] It is also well known by skilled artisans in the present fieldthat logs in adjoining walls can be oriented to certain advantageouspatterns to produce a structure wherein adjoining walls areapproximately level. Optimally, the end regions of the logs that formeach corner are oriented such that, beginning at the bottom of a cornerand moving toward the top, they exhibit a small end, small end, largeend, large end pattern (a “SSLL” pattern). For example, in FIG. 1, theends of the logs at the southeast corner are oriented such that, fromthe bottom up, they form a small end S, small end S, large end L, largeend L pattern. Of course, the ends of the bottommost two logs in a givencorner need not both be small ends, nor must they both be large ends.For example, an obvious variation on the SSLL pattern would be a patternthat goes SLLSSLL and so on. Likewise, a LSSLLSS pattern would bepossible. Since this pattern is well known to those of ordinary skill inthe instant art, it will not be discussed in further detail.Furthermore, as would be obvious to those having ordinary skill in theart of log building, the present invention can be practiced withoutorienting the logs in adjoining walls according to any such pattern.

[0069] A fourth layer of logs is then positioned in a crosswise stackabove the third-layer of logs. The fourth layer is positioned such thateach end region of each fourth-layer log rests above a third-layer log.Commonly, the fourth layer of logs is positioned such that each endregion of each fourth-layer log actually rests on a third-layer log. Forexample, the fourth-layer logs illustrated in FIG. 1 are positioned suchthat each end region of each fourth-layer log 40 rests on one end regionof a third-layer log 30. However, each end region of each fourth-layerlog need not be contiguous with the third-layer lob below. For example,it may be desirable to raise one or both ends of certain fourth-layerlogs. In such cases, a shim or the like may be placed between any suchend region and the log below. Furthermore, it is not necessary that thefourth-layer logs be directly supported by the third-layer logs. Forexample, in one aspect of the present invention, one or morefourth-layer logs are held by positioning devices (such as thosediscussed above) that can be secured to the ends of a log. Such devicesmay allow the user to adjust the position of each log vertically,horizontally, and rotationally.

[0070] Each fourth-layer log lies above and extends alongside anadjacent second-layer log to define a pair of adjacent second-layer andfourth-layer logs. For example, the bottom two logs in the east wall Eof the structure illustrated in FIG. 1 form an adjacent pair ofsecond-layer 20 and fourth-layer 40 logs. In most cases, it will bepreferable if each fourth-layer log lies directly above the adjacentsecond-layer log, such as where vertical walls are to be formed. In suchcases, the fourth-layer logs are optimally positioned such that thelongitudinal axes of each pair of adjacent second-layer and fourth-layerlogs lie generally in a common plane that is vertical. That is, suchthat each fourth-layer log lies generally plumb above anadjacent-second-layer log. For example, each fourth-layer log 40illustrated in FIG. 1 lies plumb above an adjacent second-layer log 20.If desired, though, a structure with sloped walls could be builtaccording to the present invention. In such a structure, thefourth-layer logs would be positioned such that the longitudinal axes ofadjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logs lie generally in a commonplane that is sloped to the vertical. Variations of this nature would beobvious to those having ordinary skill in the art of log building.

[0071] A second gap is formed between each pair of adjacent second-layerand fourth-layer logs. The upper and lower boundaries of each second gapare formed respectively by the bottom surface of a fourth-layer log andthe top surface of an adjacent second-layer log. This is perhaps bestseen with reference to FIG. 5A, wherein the illustrated second gap 41has an upper boundary defined by the bottom surface 45 of the adjacentfourth-layer log 40 and a lower boundary defined by the top surface 27of the adjacent second-layer log. The number of second gaps in astructure will depend on the layout of the structure. For example, thefour-walled structure shown in FIG. 1 has two second gaps 41, whereas aneight-walled structure built according to the configuration typified inFIG. 3 would have four second gaps (not shown).

[0072] Where the fourth-layer logs are positioned directly atop thethird-layer logs, the height of each second gap will typically varyalong the length of the adjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logs. Forexample, the height of each second gap will commonly be greater near theend region of each fourth-layer log that sits atop the large end regionof a third-layer log. This is best seen with reference to FIG. 5A,wherein the height of the illustrated second gap 41 is greatest near thelarge end region L of the adjacent fourth-layer log 40.

[0073] It is preferable to adjust the relative positions of each pair ofadjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logs such that each second gaphas a height is substantially the same at the small and large endregions of the adjacent fourth-layer log. That is, such that the heightof each second gap is more uniform from end to end. As is discussedbelow, by making the height of each second gap more uniform from end toend, one can minimize the wall height that is lost when grooves are cutinto the bottom surfaces of each fourth-layer log. This can beaccomplished in different ways.

[0074] In one aspect of the invention, a rough notch is cut into atleast one end region of each fourth-layer log. These notches may be cutsuch that each second gap has a substantially similar height at thesmall and large end regions of the adjacent fourth-layer log when eachfourth-layer rough notch is fitted over the third-layer log on which itrests. For example, the height of the second gap 41 illustrated in FIG.5A is greater near the large end L of the illustrated fourth-layer log40 than it is near the small end S of that log. In this case, it wouldbe desirable to cut a rough notch into the large end L of theillustrated fourth-layer log 40 such that the height of the second gap41 will be substantially the same at both ends of the fourth-layer log40 when this notch is fitted over the illustrated large end L of athird-layer log 30.

[0075] In another aspect of the present invention, positioning devicescould be used to make the height of each second gap more uniform fromend to end. As discussed above, such devices may allow the user toadjust the position of each log vertically, horizontally, androtationally. Thus, it would be possible to adjust the relativepositioning of adjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logs such that theheight of each second gap is substantially the same at the large andsmall end regions of the adjacent fourth-layer log.

[0076] In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the relativepositioning of each pair of adjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logsis adjusted such that all of the second gaps in the structure have amaximum height that is substantially the same. This may be done bycutting appropriately dimensioned rough notches into the fourth-layerlogs. Alternatively, positioning devices such as those discussed abovemay be used to adjust the relative positions of each adjacent pair ofsecond-layer and fourth-layer logs such that all of the second gaps havea maximum height that is substantially the same. As discussed below,this will minimize the amount of wall height that will ultimately belost when a groove is cut into the bottom surface of each fourth-layerlog.

[0077] Log structures can be built to virtually any height. While thepositioning of four layers of logs has been described, it would beobvious to those having ordinary skill in the art of log building thatadditional layers of logs could be added in accordance with theforegoing discussion. For example, FIG. 1 illustrates a log structurewherein several additional layers of logs have been stacked according toone aspect of the present invention. The illustrated structure includesadditional fifth-layer logs 50, sixth-layer logs 60, seventh-layer logs70, and eighth-layer logs 80 that have been added in the same manner aswas discussed with reference to the first four layers of logs.

[0078] In traditional log-by-log building, every log in a layer is fullyprocessed and finally fitted in its permanent position before any of thelogs in the layers above are processed. Thus, at any given time, thebuilder is only scribing or cutting the logs of the layer that is beingadded. For example, when constructing a four-walled structure such asthat illustrated in FIG. 1, the builder would only be working on twologs at any given time. Unfortunately, the time requirements of thetraditional methodology are well known to those who build handcraftedlog structures. With the present invention, it would be possible toscribe the long grooves and final notches for all of the logs in theentire structure at the same time. Likewise, it would be possible to cutthe long grooves and final notches into all of the logs in the structureat the same time. For example, in building a four-walled structure withnine logs in each wall, the builders could scribe the long grooves andfinal notches for all 36 logs at the same time. Likewise, once all 36logs were scribed, the builders could simultaneously cut the longgrooves and final notches for all 36 logs.

[0079] After stacking four layers of logs that are to be built accordingto the present invention, it is possible to determine the cuts that willultimately be made in such logs. The present invention can, of course,be used to build structures having more than four layers. However,discussion herein typifies use of the present invention to build thebottommost four layers in a structure.

[0080] Two different types of cuts will ultimately be made in most ofthe logs (after the dimensions for such cuts have been determined inaccordance with the present invention). A groove (or “long groove”) willbe cut along the bottom length of many logs, and a final notch will becut into both ends of most logs. FIG. 11 illustrates a log having asimple concave long groove cut LG along its bottom length (this istypical of one type of long groove that may be cut for any of the logs)and one final notch FN (although logs would typically have a final notchin both ends). FIGS. 10A-10C illustrate a second-layer log having afinal notch FN (such as is typical of the final notches cut in the logsof any layer) cut in each end. It will be understood that the discussionbelow of long grooves and final notches refers only to those logs thatrequire such cuts. That is, the discussion below should not beinterpreted to mean that each log in a structure built according to thepresent invention must have a long groove cut and final notch cuts. Aswould be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art of log building,it is not necessary to make such cuts in every log in a structure. Thetraditional manner in which the configurations of long groove cuts andfinal notch cuts are determined will now be discussed in turn.

[0081] The long groove cuts that will ultimately be made along thebottom length of each log are configured such that the top and bottomsurfaces of each pair of adjacent logs will be engaged as completely aspossible along their length when each log is fitted into its finalposition. A groove cut will be made along the bottom length of theuppermost log in each pair of adjacent logs. A groove cut is commonlymade along the bottom length of every log in a structure except the silllogs. It is typically not necessary to cut a groove in the bottom lengthof the sill logs since the bottom surfaces of these logs will not engagethe top surface of other logs.

[0082] Each groove cut that will be made along the bottom length of alog should match the contour of the top surface of the adjacent logbelow. Any suitable method for determining the configuration of a longgroove cut could be used in accordance with the present invention.Commonly, a marking instrument similar to an inside caliper is used tomark lines along the bottom length of each log that will have a longgroove. Ultimately, the wood below (in other words, between) these lineswill be removed to form a long groove.

[0083] The caliper (or “scriber”) typically has an upper arm and a lowerarm, each bearing a marking point. For example, FIG. 7 illustrates asimple scriber 90 having two spaced-apart arms. The illustrated scriber90 has a level indicator 92 that is used to keep the marking points ofthe scriber plumb. That is, in a position where the tips of the upperarm 97 and the lower arm 99 are vertically aligned. Commonly, eachscriber arm bears a marking point (such as a pencil) that is used tomark the dimensions of the groove cuts that will eventually be made.

[0084] In marking (or “scribing”) each groove cut with such aninstrument, the upper 97 and lower 99 marking points of the scriber areset a certain distance apart. This distance is commonly referred to asthe “scribe setting”. In traditional log-by-log building, builderstypically use different scribe settings for different logs in the samelayer. However, as is discussed below, the same scribe setting is usedfor each of the logs in the same layer when building according to thepresent invention.

[0085] The method in which long grooves may be scribed is best seen withreference to FIG. 7, wherein a pair of adjacent first-layer 10 andthird-layer 30 logs are illustrated. After determining the scribesetting 83 that will be used for all of the third-layer logs (as isdiscussed below), the builder brings both tips of the scriber 90 intoengagement with the illustrated pair of adjacent logs while holding thescriber 90 in a plumb position (such that the tips of the upper 97 andlower 99 arms are vertically aligned). In other words, while holding thescriber plumb, the scriber 90 is moved into a position where the tip ofthe upper arm 97 engages a surface of the illustrated third-layer log 30above the adjacent first gap 31, and the tip of the lower arm 99 engagesa surface of the illustrated first-layer log 10 below that first gap 31.The tips of the scriber are dragged along the length of the illustratedfirst-layer 10 and third-layer 30 logs, all the while keeping thescriber in a plumb position. This forms a line 84 along the length ofthe third-layer log 30 and a line 82 along the length of the first-layerlog 10. The scriber lines will commonly be serpentine or wavelike sincethey match the unique contour (or “topography”) of each log. The scribermay be dragged along the surfaces that will form the inside wall of thestructure, the outside wall of the structure, or both. Preferably, thescriber is dragged along both the inside and outside surfaces so a lineis marked on both sides of each log that is to have a long groove. Thewood below (that is, between) each of these lines will ultimately beremoved to form a long groove in each log.

[0086] A variety of differently shaped long grooves can be cut into thebottom surface of each third-layer log. A simple long groove maycomprise a concave channel cut along the bottom length of each log. Forexample, U.S. Pat. No. 2,525,659, issued to Edson et al. (the teachingsof which are herein incorporated by reference), shows a particular useof concave long grooves. One popular type of long groove that iscommonly referred to as the “double-cut long groove” comprises twoconcave channels running side-by-side along the bottom length of eachlog. Since selecting the appropriate types of long grooves to use in agiven structure would be obvious to those having ordinary skill in theart of log building, it will not be discussed in further detail.Builders commonly use a chainsaw to cut each long groove. In some cases,though, a chisel, planer, or sander may be used to perfect the cut.

[0087] A final notch cut will eventually be made in both end regions ofmost logs. As would be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the instantart, final notches are typically unnecessary for the first-layer silllogs since they are not fitted over other logs.

[0088] The configuration of each final notch cut that will be madeshould reflect the contour of the top surface of the log over which itwill ultimately be fitted. The configuration of each final notch cut iscommonly determined using a scriber in much the same was as wasdiscussed above with reference to long grooves. In marking each finalnotch cut, the upper and lower marking points of the scriber are set tothe desired scribe setting. In traditional log building, builderstypically use different scribe settings for the final notches ofdifferent logs in the same layer. However, as is discussed below, thesame scribe setting is used for every log in the same layer whenbuilding according to the present invention.

[0089] The method in which final notches are traditionally scribed isperhaps best seen with reference to FIG. 8 or 9. FIG. 8 illustrates abuilder in the process of scribing the final notch for a fourth-layerlog 40. The scriber 90 is illustrated in a plumb position wherein thetip of the upper arm 97 is engaged with a surface of the illustratedfourth-layer log 40 and the tip of the lower arm 99 is engaged with theillustrated third layer log 30. The tips of the scriber are then draggedalong the intersection of these two logs to form an outline of the finalnotch that will be cut into the illustrated fourth layer log 40. FIG. 9also shows a scriber 90 in a plumb position wherein the tip of the upperarm 97 is engaged with a surface of the illustrated fourth-layer log 40and the tip of the lower arm 99 is engaged with the illustratedthird-layer log 30. The tips of the scriber are dragged over these logs(while holding the scriber plumb) so as to form an outline 87 of thefinal notch cut that will ultimately be made in the illustratedfourth-layer log 40. This outline 87 will match the semi-circularcontour of the top of the illustrated third-layer log 30. Since thistraditional method of scribing final notches would be obvious to thosehaving ordinary skill in the art of log building, it will not bediscussed in further detail.

[0090] A maximum height of the first gaps in the structure isdetermined. That is, the builder searches all of the first gaps in thestructure to determine the single location (or locations) where theheight of a first gap is the greatest. Since each naturally-shaped loghas a unique taper and surface contour, there will typically be only onelocation between each pair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logswhere the height of the first gap formed therebetween is greatest. Inother words, there will typically be one location along the length ofthe first gap in each wall where the height of that first gap isgreatest. For example, there is a single location (not shown) along thefirst gap 31 in the north wall N of the structure shown in FIG. 1 wherethe height of that first gap 31 is greatest. The builder locates andmeasures the greatest height found in each of the first gaps in thestructure. The builder then determines which of these measurements islargest, and this measurement defines the maximum height of the firstgaps in the structure. For example, the maximum height of first gaps 39in the structure shown in FIG. 1 is located in the south wall S of thestructure. In other words, the maximum height of the first gaps 39 inthe structure is equal to the greatest separation between any pair ofadjacent first-layer and third-layer logs in the entire structure.

[0091] The builder determines a groove cut that will leave a bottomsurface of each third-layer log separated from a top surface of anadjacent first-layer log by a first vertical distance that issubstantially the same at all points along the first gaps and is atleast as great as the maximum height of the first gaps that wasdetermined above. That is, the builder determines the configuration ofeach third-layer groove cut such that if the third-layer grooves werecut and the third-layer logs were restacked without final notches, thenthe bottom surface of each stacked third-layer log would be separatedfrom the top surface of an adjacent first-layer log by a first verticaldistance that would be substantially the same at every point along anyone of the first gaps in the structure. This first vertical distance isat least as great as the maximum height of the first gaps that wasdetermined above.

[0092] The configuration of each third-layer long groove cut can bedetermined using any suitable measuring or marking means. Commonly, thisis accomplished by scribing long groove lines on each of the third-layerlogs in the manner discussed above. Where the dimensions of the longgroove cuts are determined by scribing, every third-layer log in theentire structure is scribed using the same scriber setting. This scribersetting is equal to the first vertical distance, which is at least asgreat as the maximum height of the first gaps that was determined above.

[0093] By determining the configurations of the third-layer long groovecuts such that this first vertical distance is at least as great as themaximum height of the first gaps, the builder is assured that each pairof adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs will be engaged all the wayalong the length of the adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs whenthe logs are finally fitted into a permanent position. Preferably, thefirst vertical distance is slightly larger than the maximum height ofthe first gaps, as this will assure a more substantial engagementbetween each adjacent pair of first-layer and third-layer logs whenfitted into a permanent position. Excellent results have been achievedusing a first closure distance that is about one-quarter of one inchgreater than the maximum height of the first gaps.

[0094] A maximum height of the second gaps in the structure isdetermined. That is, the builder searches all of the second gaps in thestructure to determine the location (or locations) where the height of asecond gap is greatest. In many cases, there will be only one locationbetween each pair of adjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logs wherethe height of the second gap formed therebetween is greatest. Since eachnaturally-shaped log will have a unique taper and surface contour, therewill typically be only one location between each pair of adjacentsecond-layer and fourth-layer logs where the height of the second gapformed therebetween is greatest. In other words, there will typically beone location along the length of the second gap in each wall where theheight of that second gap is greatest. For example, there is onelocation (not shown) along the west wall W of the structure illustratedin FIG. 1 where the height of that second gap 41 is greatest. Thebuilder locates and measures the greatest height found in each of thesecond gaps in the structure. The builder then determines which of thesemeasurements is largest, and this measurement defines the maximum heightof the second gaps in the structure. For example, the maximum height ofthe second gaps 49 in the structure shown in FIG. 1 is located in theeast wall E of the structure. In other words, the maximum height of thesecond gaps 49 in the structure is equal to the greatest separationbetween any pair of adjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logs in theentire structure.

[0095] The builder determines a groove cut that will leave a bottomsurface of each fourth-layer log separated from a top surface of anadjacent second-layer log by a second vertical distance that issubstantially the same at all points along the second gaps and is atleast as great as the maximum height of the second gaps that wasdetermined above. That is, the builder determines the configuration ofeach fourth-layer groove cut such that if the fourth-layer grooves werecut and the fourth-layer logs were restacked, then the bottom surface ofeach stacked fourth-layer log would be separated from the top surface ofan adjacent second-layer log by a second vertical distance that would besubstantially the same at every point along any one of the second gapsin the structure. This second vertical distance is at least as great asthe maximum height of the second gaps that was determined above.

[0096] The configuration of each fourth-layer long groove cut can bedetermined using any suitable measuring or marking means. Commonly, thisis accomplished by scribing long groove lines on each of thefourth-layer logs in the same way that was discussed above. Where thedimensions of the long groove cuts are determined by scribing, everyfourth-layer log in the entire structure is scribed using the samescriber setting. This scriber setting is equal to the second verticaldistance, which is at least as great as the maximum height of the secondgaps determined above.

[0097] By determining the configurations of the fourth-layer long groovecuts such that this second vertical distance is at least as great as themaximum height of the second gaps, the builder is assured that each pairof adjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logs will be engaged all theway along the length of the adjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logswhen fitted into a permanent position. Preferably, the second verticaldistance is slightly greater than the maximum height of the second gaps,as this will assure a more substantial engagement between each adjacentpair of second-layer and fourth-layer logs when fitted into a permanentposition. Excellent results have been achieved using a second closuredistance that is about one-quarter of one inch greater than the maximumheight of the second gaps.

[0098] If additional layers have been added to a structure (as willtypically be the case), then a maximum gap determination and a groovecut determination is made for the logs of each additional layer in thesame manner as was discussed above with reference to the logs of thefirst four layers. For example, a four-walled structure having sixlayers would have a third gap formed between each adjacent pair ofthird-layer and fifth-layer logs. A maximum height of the third gaps inthe structure would be determined in the same manner as was discussedwith reference to the first and second gaps. A long groove cut wouldthen be determined for each fifth-layer log in the same manner as wasdiscussed with reference to the third-layer and fourth-layer logs. Thiswould be repeated for as many additional layers as have been added tothe structure.

[0099] The builder determines a final notch cut that will lower both endregions of each second-layer log by a first drop distance when eachsecond-layer final notch is fitted over the first-layer log on which itrests. This first drop distance will be equal to the distance by whichthe builder wishes to lower both ends of each second-layer log in thestructure such that each second-layer log will be in a final positionwhen each second-layer final notch is fitted over the first-layer log onwhich it rests. Where scribing is used to mark the second-layer finalnotch cuts, the first drop distance will be equal to the scriber settingused to mark all of the second-layer notches.

[0100] Once the first drop distance is determined, a dimension of thethird-layer and fourth-layer final notch cuts will be fixed. Wherescribing is used to mark the third-layer and fourth-layer final notchcuts, the final notch scribe settings for every log in the third layerwill be fixed once the first drop distance is determined. Likewise, thefinal notch scribe settings for every log in the fourth layer will befixed once the first drop distance is determined. Moreover, whereadditional layers have been added according to the present invention, adimension of the final notch cuts for each additional layer will also befixed once the first drop distance has been determined. Again, wherescribing is used to mark final notches, once the first drop distance isset, the final notch scribe settings for each additional layer will befixed.

[0101] This can be illustrated by the equation: N₂=G₁−N₁; where N₁ isthe first drop distance (where scribing is used, this will be thescriber setting for the second-layer final notches); where G₁ is thefirst vertical distance (where scribing is used, this was the scribersetting used for the third-layer long grooves); and where N2 is thesecond drop distance (where scribing is used, this will be the scribersetting for the third-layer final notches). Thus, since we already knowG₁ (the first vertical distance), it can be seen that once the firstdrop setting is determined, the second drop setting becomes fixed aswell. In fact, the drop settings for other layers above become fixed aswell.

[0102] This equation can be expanded (as will be discussed later).Alternatively, it can be applied from the bottom up to determine thedrop distances of each layer of logs above. This can be done because wealready know the first vertical distance, and the second verticaldistance, and so on (i.e. the distance required to close the gapsbetween every pair of vertically adjacent layers). For example, theequation could be used next to determine the third drop distance (wherescribing is used, this will be the scriber setting used for thefourth-layer final notches) as follows: N₃=G₂−N₂; where N₂ is the seconddrop distance (where scribing is used, it is the scriber setting for thethird-layer final notches); where G₂ is the second vertical distance(where scribing is used, this was the scriber setting used for thefourth-layer long grooves); and where N₃ is the third drop distance(where scribing is used, this will be the scriber setting for thefourth-layer final notches). Since we already know G₂ (the secondvertical distance), it can be seen that the selection of the first dropsetting has also fixed the third drop setting. Likewise, the dropsettings for other layers above become fixed.

[0103] The builder determines the first drop distance according to thedistance both ends of each second-layer log should be lowered to bringthem into a final position when each second-layer final notch is fittedover the first-layer log on which it rests. That is, the first dropdistance is determined in light of how far all of the second-layer logsshould be dropped to bring them to an appropriate final position. Thebuilder has some flexibility in determining the final position intowhich the second-layer logs will be lowered. There are different finalpositions into which the second-layer logs might be moved by loweringboth ends of each second-layer log the same distance.

[0104] In the scenario typified herein (where the first-layer andsecond-layer logs are sill logs with planar bottom surfaces), thebuilder will determine a final notch cut that will lower both endregions of each second-layer log by a first drop distance and into afinal position wherein a bottom surface of each second-layer log isapproximately flush with (or just parallel to, if desired) a bottomsurface of each first-layer log when each second-layer final notch isfitted over the first-layer log on which it rests. This is best seenwith reference to FIG. 4, wherein there are shown two second-layer logs20 in a final position wherein the bottom surface 25 of eachsecond-layer log 20 is flush with the bottom surface 15 of eachfirst-layer log 10.

[0105] In scenarios where the first layer of logs (that is, the firstlayer of logs added in accordance with this invention) is not thebottommost layer in a wall, the second-layer logs will typically belowered into a final position wherein the bottom surface of eachsecond-layer log engages the top surface of an adjacent sublayer log. Insuch scenarios, the second layer of logs will have been positioned abovea sublayer of logs in a crosswise stack wherein each end region of eachsecond-layer log rests above a sublayer log. In this case, eachsecond-layer log will have been positioned to lie above and extendalongside an adjacent sublayer log to define a pair of adjacent sublayerand second-layer logs, whereby a gap is formed between each such pair ofadjacent sublayer and second-layer logs.

[0106] While the precise orientation of the sublayer logs will obviouslyvary, builders commonly orient logs in one of three basic ways: (1) suchthat the top surface of the log is generally horizontal; (2) such thatthe bottom surface of the log is generally horizontal; and (3) such thatthe longitudinal axis of the log is generally horizontal. These threescenarios are best seen with reference to FIGS. 10A-10C. FIG. 10Aillustrates a second-layer log 20 in a final position wherein the bottomsurface 25 of the illustrated log is generally aligned with a horizontalaxis H. The second-layer logs would commonly be lowered into a finalposition of this nature when the top surface of the adjacent sublayerlogs would be horizontal when finally fitted. FIG. 10B illustrates asecond-layer log 20 in a final position wherein the top surface 27 ofthe illustrated log is generally aligned with a horizontal axis H. Thiswould commonly be appropriate when the bottom surface of each of theadjacent sublayer logs would be horizontal when finally fitted. FIG. 10Cillustrates a second-layer log 20 in a final position wherein alongitudinal axis of the illustrated log is generally aligned with ahorizontal axis H. This would commonly be appropriate when thelongitudinal axis of each of the adjacent sublayer logs will behorizontal when finally fitted. Determinations of how each second-layerlog should be finally positioned in accordance with the foregoing wouldbe obvious to those of skill in the art, and will not be discussed infurther detail.

[0107] The builder determines a final notch cut that will lower both endregions of each third-layer log by a second drop distance that isapproximately equal to said first vertical distance less said first dropdistance when each third-layer final notch is fitted over thesecond-layer log on which it rests. As was discussed with reference tothe equation above, the second drop distance will be fixed once thefirst drop distance is determined (since the first vertical distance isknown).

[0108] In one aspect of the invention, the builder then determines afinal notch cut that will lower both end regions of each fourth-layerlog by a third drop distance that is approximately equal to said secondvertical distance less said second drop distance when each fourth-layerfinal notch is fitted over the third-layer log on which it rests. As wasdiscussed with reference to the equation above, the third drop distancewill also be fixed once the first drop distance is determined (since weknow the first vertical distance and the second vertical distance).

[0109] If additional layers of logs have been added to a structure, thena final notch determination is made for the logs of each additionallayer in the same manner as was discussed above with reference to thelogs of the first four layers. For example, a four-walled structurehaving six layers would have a third gap formed between each pair ofadjacent third-layer and fifth-layer logs. The maximum height of thethird gaps would be determined in the same manner as was discussed withreference to the first and second gaps. Likewise, a third verticaldistance of the fifth-layer long groove cuts would be determined in thesame manner as was discussed with reference to the third-layer andfourth-layer long groove cut determinations. Finally, the builder woulddetermine a final notch cut that will lower both end regions of eachfifth-layer log by a fourth drop distance that is approximately equal tosaid third vertical distance less said third drop distance when eachfifth-layer final notch is fitted over the fourth-layer log on which itrests. The final notches for the additional layers can be determined inthe same manner.

[0110] The equation discussed above can be expanded. The relationshipgoverned by this equation is best seen with reference to FIG. 8. In thefollowing expanded equation, it is assumed that all cut determinationare made by scribing. Furthermore, the following equation is writtenassuming the lowest notch will be N₂ (that is x must be at least two inthe following equation).

N _(x)=(−1)^(x−1)(N ₁ −G ₁ +G ₂ −G ₃ +G ₄ −G ₅ . . . G _(x−1))

[0111] Wherein N_(x) is the scribe distance for all of the final notchesin a given layer;

[0112] N₁ is the scribe distance for all of the second-layer finalnotches;

[0113] G₁ is the scribe distance for all of the long grooves in thesecond-layer logs;

[0114] G₂ is the scribe distance for all of the long grooves in thethird-layer logs;

[0115] G₃ is the scribe distance for all of the long grooves in thefourth-layer logs;

[0116] G₄ is the scribe distance for all of the long grooves in thefifth-layer logs;

[0117] G₅ is the scribe distance for all of the long grooves in thesixth-layer logs; and so on;

[0118] G_(x) is the scribe distance for all of the long grooves in thelogs of layer x+1.

[0119] In one aspect of the present invention, the same long groovescribe setting can be used for all of the logs in the entire structure.In this case, the builder would use a long groove scribe settingslightly greater than the greatest gap found anywhere between any pairof adjacent logs in the structure. Once the second-layer final notchesare scribed, the final notch scribe settings for the logs of all theremaining layers will be fixed. As seen in both forms of the equationabove, the final notch setting for the second-layer logs can be equal tohalf of the groove setting. In such a case, the same final notch scribesetting (half the groove setting) can be used for all of the logs. Forexample, if the groove setting is 6″ and the final notch setting for thesecond layer logs is 3″, then the final notch setting for all theremaining logs will also be 3″. This result would also be found usingeither of the two forms of the equation above.

[0120] Once the builder has determined all of the groove cuts and finalnotch cuts that are to be cut into the logs, the logs can be removedfrom the stack, and then cut. Since the dimensions of each cut havealready been determined for all of the logs in the structure, it ispossible for the builders to cut all of the logs at the same time.Furthermore, since the basic methods of cutting long grooves and finalnotches are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art of logbuilding, the cutting process will not be discussed in further detail.

[0121] In an alternate aspect of the present invention, the buildercould determine the greater of the maximum height of the first gaps andthe maximum height of the second gaps. Whichever distance the builderfinds to be greater would be the universal maximum height for those twogaps. This distance could be used as the scriber setting for thethird-layer logs, for the fourth-layer logs, or for both layers of logs.

[0122] A variety of other embodiments are possible and will now besummarized:

[0123] Embodiment 1) Scribing can be simplified in the following way. Ifthe widest gaps between layers of logs is held within a close tolerance(say the deviation in widest gap measurements is about ¼″ for all layersin the stacked shell), then all long grooves can be easily scribed usingone setting, instead of one setting per layer. As a consequence, if allthe long grooves are scribed with one scribe setting, then all notchesN2 and higher can either be scribed with one common setting (half thegroove setting) or with two alternating settings. The formula:N6=G5−(G4−(G3−(G2−(G1−N1)))) condenses so that in all the layers aboveLayer 2, the corner notches are either scribed with a common settingequal to G−N1 (where N1=½G, so the common setting equals ½G) or with twoalternating settings equal to N2=G−N1 or N3=G−N2 (i.e., N3=N1). Forexample, if all the long grooves of the stacked shell were scribed witha scribe setting of 4¼″ and N1 was scribed at 2⅛″, then the notches ofall the other layers would be scribed with just one scribe setting(i.e., 2⅛″=G−N1, where N1=½G, so the common setting=½G). This is theoptimal situation if the widest gaps between each layer are quite closein measurement. Alternatively, if all the long grooves of the stackedshell were scribed with a scribe setting of 4¼″, and N1 was scribed at2″, then the notches of all the other layers would be scribed withalternating settings of 2¼″ and 2″. N2=G−N1 equals 4¼″ minus 2″, whichequals 2¼″, N3=G−N2 equals 4¼″ minus 2¼″, which equals 2″, and so on.One way to hold the widest gaps between layers of logs in closetolerance is to use an adjustable lifting device to raise the lowcorners (small gaps) of layers. This embodiment changes the basic unitof construction from the layer of logs to the entire stacked shell, thatis, all the wall logs are logically a single unit.

[0124] Embodiment 2) The accelerated method can be used for buildingsthat are “chinked,” a term that means they have no long-grooves, buthave gaps between the lengths of the logs that are filled by a caulking,or chinking material. The invention will accelerate construction ofchinked log buildings. Layers of rough-notched logs would be stacked,and then the corner notches would be scribed and cut, but no longgrooves would be scribed or cut.

[0125] Embodiment 3) There are several alternatives for times whenlayers are final scribed. One would be to final scribe each layer oflogs as soon as it is rough-notched, and before the next higher layer ofrough-notched logs is applied to the stacked shell. This has theadvantage of final scribing when the gaps have not been compressed ordisturbed by the weight of higher layers. Another alternative is tofinal scribe the top layer of logs and remove them for cutting while thepenultimate layer is scribed. This could continue as the stacked shellis dismantled. Or, some layers can be final scribed immediately afterthey are rough-notched, while other layers can wait until a later timeto be final-scribed. It is obvious that further variations in the timeand order in which layers are final scribed are possible.

[0126] Embodiment 4) Two or more layers could be stacked in therough-notched condition, and then final scribed, and cut and fitted.This would be an advance over the one-log-at-a-time method. This wouldresult in a log shell that could be completely fitted and assembled inthe manufacturing yard. There may be occasions when it is useful to havethe log shell standing completed in the manufacturing yard, for example,when a complex, or high, roof system must be built.

[0127] Embodiment 5) Log buildings that have more than one story of logwalls can get tall and inconvenient to build. It is possible to build atop portion of the walls in a stacked shell that is separate from abottom portion of the log walls, and then join them later. A variationon this would be to completely stack and final-scribe a bottom portionof the walls, and then remove the top two layers from the bottomportion, re-stack the top two layers on temporary supports and continueupwards, stacking the upper portion of the walls until complete.

[0128] Embodiment 6) Machine-peeled logs, or manufactured logs, could beused instead of hand-peeled logs with their fully natural shapes andsizes. This would make construction faster by reducing or eliminatingthe variety of log shapes and sizes. When the logs have lessindividuality and variety, then log selection is easier, controlling thewidest gaps between layers is easier, and scribing is easier.

[0129] Embodiment 7) Every log in the structure would be suspended closeto each other and stacked as if in a wall. The logs could be suspendedfrom a hanger attached near each end. Each log end could beindependently raised or lowered, and the log could be rotated around itslongitudinal axis. There would be no need for rough notches. Positioninglogs would be easy and quick, and a log's position could be adjustedeven with other layers stacked above them. This would bring a level offlexibility unavailable until now because a rough-notched log cannot berotated, and it is not easy to change the gaps between layers in arough-notched stack. The scribe distance would be larger than with othermethods, but the widest gaps between logs, the widest gaps betweenlayers, and widest gaps in the entire structure could be easily andclosely adjustable to be virtually identical. As a result, there wouldbe just one scribe setting for all the grooves, and one scribe settingfor all the notches. This embodiment would could employ equipmentcapable of suspending whole logs, but it would be fast and efficient.Logs would be handled few times, and handling would be safe andnon-marking.

[0130] Ramification 1 is a device that holds logs that do not extend inone piece from one corner to another corner. Using logs that are shorterthan walls would save on material costs by allowing the use of shorterpieces of logs cut where there will be windows or doors. This might becombined with a device mentioned in Embodiment 1 above that both adjuststhe gaps between layers of logs and also holds short logs in therough-notched state.

[0131] Ramification 2 concerns flattening sill logs. Eventually, thelogs that rest upon the foundation or sub-floor will be flattened ontheir bottom surface to provide bearing surfaces and stability. TheLayer 1 and Layer 2 sill logs can be flattened before they are stackedin the shell. Or Layer 1 sill logs can be flattened and Layer 2 silllogs left round on the bottom until the stacked shell is dismantled. Orboth Layer 1 and Layer 2 sill logs could be left round on the bottomuntil the stacked shell is dismantled. The options that delay cuttingsome of the sill logs flat have the advantage of allowing forflexibility in the height of the wall and in door headers, which isuseful because it allows door headers to be located in convenientportion of the wall log.

[0132] Ramification 3 concerns scaffolding log walls. Because anaccelerated building is easier and less expensive to scaffold, it ispossible to cut some or all of the rough-notches from scaffoldinginstead of bringing the log to the ground. This would reduce by two thenumber of times that logs are handled in an accelerated building. Thiswould mean 4 lifts versus 7 lifts for the traditional building.

[0133] Ramification 4 concerns a technique variously calledunderscribing or overscribing. This is a way of varying the scribedistances of the corner notches so that newly-completed log shells havetightly-fitting corner notches and slightly loose long grooves. Overtime, as the logs lose moisture and shrink in diameter, some of theweight is transferred to the long grooves. The notch scribe-setting iscalculated as above and then reduced by the underscribe amount desiredfor that log.

[0134] While a preferred embodiment of the present invention has beendescribed, it should be understood that various changes, adaptations,and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spiritof the invention and the scope of the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of building a structure having aplurality of log walls, the method comprising: a) providing a pluralityof logs wherein each log has a first end region and a second end region;b) positioning a first layer of logs in a spaced-apart configuration; c)positioning a second layer of logs above the first layer of logs in acrosswise stack wherein each end region of each second-layer log restsabove a first-layer log; d) positioning a third layer of logs above thesecond layer of logs in a crosswise stack wherein each end region ofeach third-layer log rests above a second-layer log, each third-layerlog lying above and extending alongside an adjacent first-layer log todefine a pair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs, whereby afirst gap is formed between each such pair of adjacent first-layer andthird-layer logs; e) positioning a fourth layer of logs above the thirdlayer of logs in a crosswise stack wherein each end region of eachfourth-layer log rests above a third-layer log, each fourth-layer loglying above and extending alongside an adjacent second-layer log todefine a pair of adjacent second-layer and fourth-layer logs, whereby asecond gap is formed between each such pair of adjacent second-layer andfourth-layer logs; f) determining a maximum height of the first gaps inthe structure; g) scribing long groove lines representing long groovecuts on all of the third-layer logs using a single long groove scribesetting, the single long groove scribe setting used for all of thethird-layer logs being a first vertical distance that is at least asgreat as the maximum height determined in step f); h) determining amaximum height of the second gaps in the structure; i) scribing longgroove lines representing long groove cuts on all of the fourth-layerlogs using a single long groove scribe setting, the single long groovescribe setting used for all of the fourth-layer logs being a secondvertical distance that is at least as great as the maximum heightdetermined in step h); j) scribing final notch lines on all of thesecond-layer logs using a single final notch scribe setting, the singlefinal notch scribe setting used for all of the second-layer logsrepresenting a final notch cut that will lower both end regions of eachsecond-layer log by a first drop distance and into a final position wheneach second-layer final notch is fitted over the first-layer log onwhich it rests; and k) scribing final notch lines on all of thethird-layer logs using a single final notch scribe setting, the singlefinal notch scribe setting used for all of the third-layer logsrepresenting a final notch cut that will lower both end regions of eachthird-layer log by a second drop distance that is approximately equal tosaid first vertical distance less said first drop distance when eachthird-layer final notch is fitted over the second-layer log on which itrests.
 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising scribing final notchlines on all of the fourth-layer logs using a single final notch scribesetting, the single final notch scribe setting used for all of thefourth-layer logs representing a final notch cut that will lower bothend regions of each fourth-layer log by a third drop distance that isapproximately equal to said second vertical distance less said seconddrop distance when each fourth-layer final notch is fitted over thethird-layer log on which it rests.
 3. The method of claim 2 furthercomprising positioning additional layers of logs above the third andfourth layers of logs, said additional layers of logs being arranged inthe manner described in steps c) through e) of claim 1, whereby a thirdgap is formed between each third-layer log and an adjacent log of afirst of said additional layers, and a fourth gap is formed between eachfourth-layer log and an adjacent log of a second of said additionallayers, and so on for all of the logs of said additional layers.
 4. Themethod of claim 3 further comprising determining a maximum height of thethird gaps in the structure, scribing long groove lines on all of thelogs of said first of said additional layers using a single long groovescribe setting, the single long groove scribe setting used for all ofthe logs of said first of said additional layers being a third verticaldistance that is at least as great as said maximum height of the thirdgaps in the structure, determining a maximum height of the fourth gapsin the structure, scribing long groove lines on all of the logs of saidsecond of said additional layers using a single long groove scribesetting, the single long groove scribe setting used for all of the logsof said second of said additional layers being a fourth verticaldistance that is at least as great as said maximum height of the fourthgaps in the structure, wherein maximum gap heights are determined andlong groove lines are scribed in this manner for all of the logs of saidadditional layers.
 5. The method of claim 4 further comprising scribingfinal notch lines on all of the logs of said first of said additionallayers using a single final notch scribe setting, the single final notchscribe setting used for all of the logs of said first of said additionallayers representing a final notch cut that will lower both end regionsof each of the logs of said first of said additional layers by a fourthdrop distance that is approximately equal to said third verticaldistance less said third drop distance when each final notch of each logof said first of said additional layers is fitted over the fourth-layerlog on which it rests, scribing final notch lines on all of the logs ofsaid second of said additional layers using a single final notch scribesetting, the single final notch scribe setting used for all of the logsof said second of said additional layers representing a final notch cutthat will lower both end regions of each of the logs of said second ofsaid additional layers by a fifth drop distance that is approximatelyequal to said fourth vertical distance less said fourth drop distancewhen each final notch of each log of said second of said additionallayers is fitted over the log of said first of said additional layers onwhich it rests, wherein final notch lines are scribed in this manner forall of the logs of said additional layers.
 6. The method of claim 1wherein a common long groove scribe setting is used to scribe longgroove lines for all of the third-layer and fourth-layer logs, saidcommon long groove scribe setting being slightly greater than the largerof the maximum height determined in step f) of claim 1 and the maximumheight determined in step h) of claim
 1. 7. The method of claim 6further comprising positioning additional layers of logs above the thirdand fourth layers of logs, said additional layers of logs being arrangedin the manner described in steps c) through e) of claim 1, wherein saidcommon long groove scribe setting is used to scribe long groove linesfor all of the logs of said additional layers.
 8. The method of claim 6wherein one of two alternating final notch scribe settings is used toscribe final notch lines for all of the second-layer, third-layer, andfourth-layer logs, such that a first of said two alternating final notchscribe settings is used to scribe final notch lines for all of thesecond-layer logs, and a second of said two alternating final notchscribe settings is used to scribe final notch lines for all of thethird-layer logs, and said first of said two alternating final notchscribe settings is used to scribe final notch lines for all of thefourth-layer logs.
 9. The method of claim 8 further comprisingpositioning additional layers of logs above the third and fourth layersof logs, said additional layers of logs being arranged in the mannerdescribed in steps c) through e) of claim 1, wherein said second of saidtwo alternating final notch scribe settings is used to scribe finalnotch lines for all of the logs of a first of said additional layers,and said first of said two alternating final notch scribe settings isused to scribe final notch lines for all of the logs of a second of saidadditional layers, wherein said two alternating final notch scribesettings are used to scribe final notch lines in this alternating mannerfor all of the logs of said additional layers.
 10. The method of claim 6wherein a common final notch scribe setting is used to scribe finalnotch lines for all of the second-layer, third-layer, and fourth-layerlogs, said common final notch scribe setting being approximately equalto one half of said common long groove scribe setting.
 11. The method ofclaim 10 further comprising positioning additional layers of logs abovethe third and fourth layers of logs, said additional layers of logsbeing arranged in the manner described in steps c) through e) of claim1, wherein said common final notch scribe setting is used to scribefinal notch lines for all of the logs of said additional layers.
 12. Amethod of building a structure having a plurality of log walls, themethod comprising: a) providing a plurality of logs wherein each log hasa first end region and a second end region; b) positioning a first layerof logs in a spaced-apart configuration; c) positioning a second layerof logs above the first layer of logs in a crosswise stack wherein eachend region of each second-layer log rests above a first-layer log; d)positioning a third layer of logs above the second layer of logs in acrosswise stack wherein each end region of each third-layer log restsabove a second-layer log, each third-layer log lying above and extendingalongside an adjacent first-layer log to define a pair of adjacentfirst-layer and third-layer logs, whereby a first gap is formed betweeneach such pair of adjacent first-layer and third-layer logs; e)determining a maximum height of the first gaps in the structure; f)scribing long groove lines representing long groove cuts on all of thethird-layer logs using a single long groove scribe setting, G1, saidsingle long groove scribe setting, G1, used for all of the third-layerlogs being at least as great as the maximum height determined in stepe); g) scribing final notch lines on all of the second-layer logs usinga single final notch scribe setting, N1, said single final notch scribesetting, N1, used for all of the second-layer logs representing a finalnotch cut that will lower both end regions of each second-layer log intoa final position when each second-layer final notch is fitted over thefirst-layer log on which it rests; and h) scribing final notch linesrepresenting final notch cuts on all of the third-layer logs using asingle final notch scribe setting, N2, where N2=G1−N1.
 13. The method ofclaim 12 further comprising cutting the long groove and final notchesinto each log according to the lines scribed in steps f) through h) ofclaim 12.